GMO foods: Pros and cons in health

Spread the love

The debate between defenders of both sides goes a long way, transgenic foods are easy to process but difficult to digest.

The debate between defenders of both sides gives much. Biotechnology is the science that is at the forefront of the pleasant Super Fast Keto Boost face of transgenic foods ; optimistically, they ensure that these foods will meet the needs of the 9 billion inhabitants that the land is expected to have by 2050.

Although food is part of our survival, this issue has generated surprise in various scenarios. GMO foods were created with a “good intention”; provide food to the most needy villages, by geographical location, which prevents them from using land to cultivate it, or because the lands do not have sufficient quality and conditions to work them.

Transgenic foods are normal, natural to look , taste and touch. The difference they have with respect to others is that they come from samples already genetically modified in laboratories. The problems themselves can present , is that in some cases when these foods are modified, they are combined with components of others that may have allergenic agents, for example some nuts such as nuts. It may be that a transgenic tomato has been combined with part of the properties of the nut, and a person allergic to this dried fruit can consume a treated tomato without knowing it, and suffer all the symptoms due to lack of information.

That is why one of the initiatives of the groups that supervise this type of food, is to ask the industries to identify and label products that have a transgenic origin, to prevent people allergic to any of these components, can prevent unnecessary damage

Transgenic foods pros

It is undeniable that there are factors that drive the development of transgenic foods that overlap potential health risks; One portion of these factors are commercial and the other portion are more noble and commitment to humanity. The most marked goals of the development and commercialization of transgenic foods is that they are easy to grow, that require few resources and that are resistant to pests; Rather than making their production economical, it is also about large-scale production to address serious problems such as famine.

Speaking of transgenic foods as a measure of hunger reduction, there is more evidence that this is not being achieved than those that claim that it is being fulfilled. Let’s see, it’s been 20 years since GM crops are being made. So far, there is no relevant evidence demonstrating a decrease in hunger. According to various sources that disapprove the cultivation of transgenic foods, there are several reasons to stop defending them, which are listed below.

GM food points against

FAO has shown that enough food is already produced in the world to meet the needs of everyone in the world. So it is not about quantity, but about distribution; poverty and exclusion are factors that determine people’s access to the food they need; by not being able to have land, by not having the resources, by not being able to have representation of effective and efficient authorities. In short, hunger ends up as a result of exclusion and poverty.

Even more alarming is that foods that are grown with transgenesis technology are not used for mass consumption foods such as cereals, but rather for the manufacture of other items; livestock, vehicles and even to make clothes.

Contrary to the original idea of ​​providing food and better quality of life to the poorest people, in cases such as Brazil, it has been noted that the so-called “green deserts” are those where the land is intended to be cultivated by large companies of transgenics, and displace the natural inhabitants that were in it, forcing them to start other forms of life away from there.

It was claimed that implementing GM crops was not going to damage any other type of crops, since they could live together normally. However, these critics point out that it is false that farmers can decide whether to use transgenic or organic crops, since a fundamental rule of biology is that the species that are together end up crossing each other. In this way, GM crops end up contaminating organic crops.

GMOs, a science that does not succeed

It is important to point out that transgenics rest in very few companies, such as Monsanto, Dupont, Syngenta, Bayer, BASF and Dow, which lead most of the research and patents in this area, reaching up to 60% of the market world of seeds, as well as curiously control almost 80% of the petrochemical Super Fast Keto Boost Reviews industry. It seems that GM foods only carry health risks and collaboration with a whole system that is detrimental to healthy ecosystems and societies.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *